discussion: should `jot objects` return local filesystem paths? #46

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-10-21 07:49:23 +00:00 by treadful · 1 comment

treadful commented

2025-10-21 07:49:23 +00:00

Owner

Right now, the jot objects command returns relative paths to the bucket. Perhaps it should be in alignment with everything else and return local filesystem paths, even if files do not exist.

This could also lead to more confusion if it doesn't exist locally.

Right now, the `jot objects` command returns relative paths to the bucket. Perhaps it should be in alignment with everything else and return local filesystem paths, even if files do not exist. This could also lead to more confusion if it doesn't exist locally.

treadful commented

2025-10-25 06:05:16 +00:00

Author

Owner

Implemented in #45